★ Exam Tip: The #1 tested distinction in this chapter is ratio
vs rate. Voltage, resistance, resistivity are RATIOS — read one point off a graph and divide, NEVER take a
gradient. Current is a RATE — you DO take a gradient (or use area under an I-t graph if current isn't constant).
1. Charge
Charge: "A property that causes an object to experience a force in an electric field."
Measured in Coulombs (C). Q=It. Can be +ve or −ve. Scalar. Like charges repel, unlike charges attract.
★ Charge is quantised: Q = Ne (e = elementary charge = 1.6×10⁻¹⁹ C, N = number of elementary
charges)
Charge is a disbalance of +ve and −ve charges — e.g. +2C protons and −2C electrons together give net charge 0;
remove the electrons and only +2C protons remain as net charge.
2. Current
Current: Rate of flow of charge. Scalar, measured in Amperes (A). I = dQ/dt =
ΔQ/Δt || ΔQ = I×Δt
Gradient of a Q-t graph = Current. If current is CHANGING, use the area under an I-t
graph to get ΔQ. If current is CONSTANT, ΔQ=I×Δt directly (simple rectangle area).
★ Conventional vs actual current: We follow CONVENTIONAL current —
flow of +ve charges. In actuality, current is the flow of negative charges/electrons. If the examiner
explicitly asks for the true direction, follow that (electron flow); otherwise always default to conventional
current in diagrams and calculations.
Why conventional current stuck: early theory was built assuming
positive-charge flow (before electrons were discovered). Since flipping the assumed direction doesn't change any
calculated numeric answer, the "wrong" convention was kept rather than rewriting everything.
3. Voltage: Potential Difference vs EMF
Voltage is measured in volts. Both PD and EMF share the formula V=W/Q (a ratio — read one point off
a graph, never a gradient).
Potential Difference
Electromotive Force (EMF)
Work done per unit charge moving that charge from ONE POINT TO ANOTHER in a circuit. OR: work done per unit
charge converting electrical energy to other forms.
Work done per unit charge moving that charge AROUND THE WHOLE CIRCUIT. OR: work done per unit charge
converting chemical energy to electrical energy.
Shotgun analogy — voltage vs current, "what kills": current is like
the bullet doing the damage; voltage is like the shooter initiating and driving it. Current cannot exist without
voltage driving it ("never any current for zero volts"). They always act together — voltage supplies the energy,
current is the flow that disrupts the body's own electrical (nervous) signals.
4. Ohm's Law
"The potential difference across a component is directly proportional to the current, given the temperature
remains constant." (Temperature constant ⟹ resistance constant, since R depends on temperature via lattice
vibrations.)
V ∝ I ⟹ V = IR ⟹ R = V/I (ratio)
5. Resistance & Resistivity
Resistance: Hindrance to the flow of charge. Scalar, measured in Ohms (Ω). R=V/I
(ratio). Caused by lattice vibrations — electrons collide with vibrating positive nuclei,
impeding flow.
Relationship
Physical reason
R ∝ l
Longer wire = more lattice collisions along the path
R ∝ T
Higher T → more violent lattice vibrations → more/harder collisions
R ∝ 1/A
Larger area = more "lanes" for electrons to flow around obstructions
★ CRITICAL warning — the three k's are NOT interchangeable: R∝l
gives R=k₁l; R∝T gives R=k₂T; R∝1/A gives RA=k₃. These three constants are completely different — never combine
them (e.g. never write R/l=R/T). Each relationship is ONLY valid when the OTHER TWO factors are held constant. If
two factors change at once, use the unified R=ρl/A instead.
★ R = ρ(l/A) ρ = resistivity → constant for a material, constant for a constant
temperature
R₁A₁/l₁ = ρ = R₂A₂/l₂
Copper wire comparisonWorked example
A copper wire (length l, area A) has resistance R. What is the resistance of another copper wire, length l/2,
area 2A?
"Is it voltage or current that kills?" — worked numbers: LED
resistance 13Ω, human resistance 10,000Ω. At 9V: LED current ≈0.7A; human current = 9×10⁻⁴A. "It's not the voltage
that kills and neither the current alone kills. Since everything has a resistance, you need a specific amount of
current to kill, which can only be produced with a high enough voltage."
6. Ohmic vs Non-Ohmic Conductors (I-V Graphs)
Ohmic: V∝I, straight line, R constantFilament bulb: R↑ as I flows (heats up, curves toward V)Thermistor: R↓ as I flows (temp↑ → R↓)
Filament bulb: "As current flows, temperature increases, resistance
therefore increases and the graph bends towards the voltage axis."
Thermistor: As temp↑, R↓ (used as a thermometer). As temp↓, R↑.
Diode: forward bias needs the 0.7V "knee voltage" to conduct; reverse breakdown at very high −ve V
LDR: As light intensity increases, resistance decreases (and vice versa). Thermistor: As temperature increases, resistance decreases (and vice versa).
7. Series & Parallel Circuits
Parallel connection: 2 or more things connected across each other. Series connection: 2 or more things connected one after another (current has only one
direction to flow).
Identifying mixed circuits — 3 worked patterns:
1) R₁ in series with (R₂∥R₃): "R₁ is in series with the combined resistance of R₂ & R₃ in parallel."
2) R₂,R₃ in series (one branch) ∥ R₁ (other branch): "R₂ and R₃ are in series. R₁ is in parallel to the combined
resistance of R₂ & R₃."
3) Bridge/diamond arrangement redrawn as two parallel branches, each an internal series pair: "R₁ and R₂ are in
series and R₃ and R₄ are in series. The branches are in parallel."
Series Circuits
Parallel Circuits
Current remains the SAME throughout
Voltage is the SAME across each branch
V_T = V₁+V₂+...
I_T = I₁+I₂+...
R_T = R₁+R₂+...
1/R_T = 1/R₁+1/R₂+...
Cells in series ADD: V_T=2+3=6V (increases voltage)
Equal cells in parallel: V_T stays the same, e.g. 3V (provides more current/capacity)
Why: R=∞ ⟹ I=V/R=V/∞=0 — so no current flows into the voltmeter, and the circuit being measured isn't
disturbed
Why: R=0 ⟹ V=IR=0 — no voltage drop across it, no hindrance to current, doesn't disturb the circuit
9. Worked Circuit Exercises
Exercise 1 — series circuit, lamp turn-on + charge/workWorked
example
4Ω resistor, 1Ω lamp, 3Ω resistor, 12V battery, all in series, current 1.5A.
Will a lamp needing 3V turn on? V_T=I_T R_T: 12=I_T(4+1+3) ⟹ I_T=1.5A; V(1Ω
lamp)=(1.5)(1)=1.5V ⟹ lamp will NOT turn on (1.5V < 3V)Circuit runs 1hr: Q_T=I×Δt=1.5×3600=5400C; W_T=V_T×Q_T=12×5400=64,800 JWork done across the 3Ω resistor: V(3Ω)=(1.5)(3)=4.5V; W=(4.5)(5400)=24,300 J
Exercise 2 — short circuit concept, correcting a flawed circuitConceptual
John's circuit has a lamp F that never turns on when the switch closes.
Q) What is a short? "You give a zero resistance pathway" ⟹ I=V/R→0 ⟹ I=∞ — current takes the
zero-resistance path, bypassing the intended component entirely.
The fix: put the ammeter directly in series with the lamp, and the voltmeter directly across just
the lamp — remove any parallel path that bypasses (shorts out) the lamp.
Two parallel branches (2Ω+1Ω vs 3Ω+4Ω) off a 36V battery: R_T=(1/3+1/7)⁻¹=2.1Ω ⟹ I_T=36/2.1=17.14A; branch
currents 12A and 5.14A; branch voltages 24V, 12V, 15.4V, 20.6V — found via V=IR on each resistor using its own
branch current.
A more complex 5-branch network (10V battery) is solved the same way: find R_T for each parallel
section first, use V_T=I_T R_T for the total current, then apply V=IR locally within each branch using that
branch's own current.
★ General method for combined networks: 1) simplify parallel
sections into their equivalent resistance. 2) Find total current from the battery via V_T=I_T R_T. 3) Work
OUTWARD from the battery: the total current splits at each parallel junction according to each branch's own
resistance (V=IR locally), and voltmeters/ammeters read whatever is local to their position.
Series circuit: variable resistor + filament lamp, ammeter reads 3A. I-V graph gives two curves
("resistor," "filament lamp"). At I=3A, resistor reads V=30, lamp reads V=40.
Series ⟹ same current through both, total V = sum: V_T = 30+40 = 70V (the
battery's EMF)
Parallel circuit: variable resistor (4.2A) ∥ another component (3A), battery 6V. At V=6V, resistor
branch reads I=3A, other branch reads I=4.2A.
Parallel ⟹ same voltage across both, total I = sum: I_T = 3+4.2 =
7.2A
Trick: read the SHARED quantity (current for series, voltage for
parallel) straight off the x/y axis at the given value, then read each curve's corresponding value — no algebra
needed, just careful graph reading.
10. Electrical Power & Energy
Three equivalent derivations from P=dW/dt:
V=W/Q ⟹ W=VQ; P=d(VQ)/dt = V(dQ/dt) [V const] ⟹ ① P=IV
Sub V=IR: P=I(IR) ⟹ ② P=I²R
Sub I=V/R: P=(V/R)V ⟹ ③ P=V²/R
E = IVt OR E = I²Rt OR E = V²t/R
w18qp22q6 — series circuit + resistivityStructured Q
Battery EMF 7.0V (negligible r), in series with resistor X (5.2Ω), lamp Y (6.0Ω), resistor Z (unknown,
PD=1.4V).
s18qp21q6 — filament lamps in parallel + resistivity ratioStructured
Q
Battery EMF 4.5V (negligible r), lamps P&Q in parallel, resistor R in series with the pair. I_P=0.15A. I-V
graph given for both lamps.
(i) Both lamps share the same PD (parallel). At that shared V (2.7V from
graph): I_P=0.15A, I_Q=0.09A ⟹ I_T=0.24A(ii) R_P=2.7/0.15=18Ω; R_Q=2.7/0.09=30Ω; R=(V_T−2.7)/I_T=(4.5−2.7)/0.24 ⟹
R=7.5Ω(iii) Diameter of P's wire = 2× diameter of Q's wire, same resistivity. Ratio l_P/l_Q: R=ρl/A
⟹ l=AR/ρ=πd²R/4ρ; l_P/l_Q = 4×(R_P/R_Q) = 4×(18/30) ⟹ ratio=2.4
(iv) Lamp Q's wire breaks. Effect on lamp P's resistance? "The voltage across lamp P increases. As
the voltage increases, there is a greater current through P and therefore its resistance also increases."
w19qp22q6 — diode + resistor circuitStructured Q
I-V graph given for resistor X and a diode. Circuit: cell EMF E, resistor Y in parallel with (diode in series
with X). Cell current 9.3mA, diode current 7.5mA.
(i) Diode resistance at V=0.60V: R=V/I=0.6/(7.5×10⁻³) ⟹ R=80Ω(ii) As V rises 0.60→0.75V, diode resistance decreases (confirmed: R drops from 80Ω to
56Ω at 0.7V/12.5mA)(c)(i) Reading the diode's I-V graph at 7.5mA gives ≈0.6V across it; E = 0.6+0.3 (extra drop
across X) ⟹ E=0.90V(ii) Current through Y = 9.3−7.5=1.8mA; V=IR: 0.90=(1.8×10⁻³)R_Y ⟹ R_Y=500Ω(iii) Power in diode: P=IV=(7.5×10⁻³)(0.6) ⟹ P=4.5×10⁻³ W(iv) New cell EMF 0.50V: reading the graph at V=0.50V for the diode ⟹
current≈2.5mA
11. Deriving I = nAve
Electron density (n): Number of electrons per unit volume, constant for a material
[unit: m⁻³].
(i) R_XY=(1/2.4+1/1.2)⁻¹=0.80Ω; I=V/R=6/0.8=7.5A; R=V/I=3/7.5 ⟹
R=0.40Ω(ii) Power in X: P=V²/R=6²/2.4 ⟹ P=15W(iii)1. A_X=3×A_Y, same ρ,n. Ratio l_X/l_Y: R=ρl/A ⟹ R₁A₁/l₁=R₂A₂/l₂ ⟹
(2.4)(3A)/l_X=(1.2)(A)/l_Y ⟹ ratio=6.02. Ratio of drift velocities v_X/v_Y: I=nAve ⟹ v=I/(nAe); v_X/v_Y=(I_X/I_Y)×(1/3) [A_X=3A_Y];
I_X=2.5A, I_Y=5A ⟹ ratio≈0.17
w17qp22q6 — damaged wire, I=nAve applied to varying cross-sectionStructured Q
(i) Total charge of free electrons in a wire: Q = nAle(ii) I=dQ/dt=d(nAle)/dt=nAe(dl/dt) ⟹ I=nAve — shown
Wire damaged: resistivity unchanged, diameter reduces from d (at X) to 0.69d (at Y) over 3.0mm. Current 0.50A.
(i) Ratio v_Y/v_X: v=I/(nAe) ⟹ v_Y/v_X = A_X/A_Y = 1/0.69² ⟹
ratio=2.1(ii)1. Main wire (X) has resistance/length 1.7×10⁻²Ωm⁻¹. Resistance/length at Y: (R/l)_Y =
(R/l)_X × A_X/A_Y = 1.7×10⁻² × (1/0.69²) ⟹ ≈0.036 Ωm⁻¹2. Power dissipated: P=I²R = (0.5)²×(3.6×10⁻²×3×10⁻³) ⟹ P≈2.7×10⁻⁵ W
(iii) Diameter further decreases, I constant. "As the diameter decreases, the cross sectional area
decreases and so the resistance increases. The power will also increase as P=I²R [with I constant]."
w18qp22q7 — sketching drift-speed vs position (tapering wire)Structured Q — graph sketch
Wire XY, diameter varies linearly: d at X, d/2 at Y. Current I is the same throughout (charge conservation).
Sketch: a non-linear, increasingly steep rising curve from v_x at X to 4v_x at Y (matches v∝1/d²
as d shrinks linearly).
12. Internal Resistance
The small resistance r drawn with each battery to account for power losses through it.
Derivation:
V_T=I_T R_T; E=I(R+r); E=IR+Ir; E=V_t+Ir
★ V_t = E − Ir (y=mx+c form: gradient=−r, y-intercept=E)
V_t vs I: gradient=−r, y-intercept=E, x-intercept=E/r. (Green: EMF halved, r doubled)
Note: Power delivered to the external resistor R is MAXIMUM when
r=R.
Choosing R₁ vs R₂ for the same power P₂ (either side of the peak):
the power loss through internal resistance is ↓P=↓I²r — since a LARGER R (R₂) means a SMALLER current, it wastes
LESS power in the internal resistance even though the useful power P₂ delivered is the same either way. Prefer
the larger resistance (smaller current) option.
s19qp21q6 — full internal resistance structured QStructured Q with
graph
(a) Why is V < E? "Energy is wasted in the internal resistance."(b) V=E−Ir
(c)(i) V-I graph, y-intercept=2.8: "Upon linearising V=E−Ir, we can see that the e.m.f. can be
given by the y-intercept."
(ii) gradient=−r=(0.7−2.8)/(1.5−0) ⟹ r=1.4Ω(d)(i) Battery stores 9.2kJ, V adjusted to 2.1V. From graph at V=2.1, I=0.5A; R=V/I=2.1/0.5 ⟹
R=4.2Ω(ii) Electrons through battery in 1.0s: Q=It=0.5×1=0.5C; Q=Ne ⟹ N=3.1×10¹⁸(iii) Time for energy to drop to 1.6kJ: P=ΔW/Δt ⟹ Δt=(9.2−1.6)×10³/(0.5×2.8) ⟹ Δt=5.4×10³
s
w20qp23q6 — R∝1/A² derivation, R vs 1/I graph linearizationStructured Q
(b) Show R∝1/A² (volume V constant as wire extends): R=ρl/A; V=lA ⟹ l=V/A;
R=ρ(V/A)/A=ρV/A² ⟹ R∝1/A² (ρ,V constant)(c) Kirchhoff's 2nd law: R=(E/I)−r [from V_t=E−Ir and R=V_t/I]
(d) R vs 1/I graph given: linearized form R=E(1/I)−r, gradient=E, y-intercept=−r.
(i) Power in R at I=2.0A: 1/I=0.5 ⟹ R=5.4Ω (from graph); P=I²R=(2)²×5.4 ⟹
P=22W(ii)1. y-intercept=−r=−0.6 ⟹ r=0.6Ω2. gradient=E=(5.4−(−0.6))/(0.5−0) ⟹ E=12V
13. Kirchhoff's Laws
Kirchhoff's First Law (KCL): Sum of incoming currents at a junction = sum of outgoing
currents. Based on conservation of charge.
★ ΣI_incoming = ΣI_outgoing
Three worked KCL junctionsWorked examples
1) In: 1A,5A,12A. Out: 3x. ⟹ 1+5+12=3x ⟹ x=6A2) In: 0.5A,2.5A. Out: x ⟹ x=3A. [Separate junction] In: 4A,9A,3A. Out: y ⟹
y=16A3) In: 7A,8A,3A. Out: xA (all treated as one signed equation): 7+8+3+x=0 ⟹ x=−18A —
negative result tells us our marked direction was WRONG (it's actually incoming, not outgoing)
Kirchhoff's Second Law (KVL): Sum of EMFs = sum of PDs in a closed loop. "The sum of
voltages in a closed loop is always zero." Based on conservation of energy.
+E − IR = 0 ⟹ E = IR
★ Sign-convention method (5 steps):
Make any ONE battery your reference battery and mark its + and − terminals.
For any resistors/energy-consuming devices, make the leg closer to the battery's + terminal "+".
Choose a direction of looping: ACW or CW.
As you move through a component: + → − treat the voltage as +ve; − → + treat it as −ve.
Write the equation down and equate it to zero.
★ Multi-component rule: for multiple components, choose only ONE
reference battery and use it to mark polarity of ALL resistors. If you have more than one battery, you MUST use
KVL (can't just add EMFs directly).
Three worked KVL loops (single → multiple batteries)Worked
examples
1 battery, 2Ω+4Ω: +12−I(4)−I(2)=0 ⟹ 12=6I ⟹ I=2A1 battery + extra drop, 4Ω+3Ω: +12−3I−6−4I=0 ⟹ 6=7I ⟹ I=6/7 A3 batteries (6V,3V,2V) + three resistors (2Ω,1Ω,2Ω) in one loop: +6−2I−3−1I−2I+2=0 ⟹ 5=5I ⟹
I=1A
w17qp21q5 — three-cell circuit, KCL+KVL across 2 loopsStructured
Q
Rectangle WXYZ with cells E₃,E₁ and a diagonal branch (R₂,E₂). Currents I₁,I₂,I₃.
Potentiometer: An electrical device used to measure the EMF of a battery. A driver cell
(known EMF) drives current through a uniform wire; a galvanometer (used as a sensitive ammeter) finds the "balance
point" where no current flows in the unknown-battery branch.
★ Why this works: V_t=E−Ir. At balance, I=0 ⟹ V_t = E exactly
— the terminal voltage equals the EMF precisely when no current flows. This is why a potentiometer measures EMF
directly, unlike a voltmeter which always draws some current (however small) and therefore always reads slightly
less than the true EMF.
Since R∝l and V∝R (constant driver current) ⟹ ★ V ∝ l (voltage along the wire is
proportional to length — the basis of every potentiometer calculation)
Basic balance-point exampleWorked example
Driver: 12V across a 1m wire. Balance point at 62.5cm.
12V:1m = x:0.625m ⟹ x = E = 7.5V
★ Progressive variants — where an added resistor matters: the
position of an extra resistor in the circuit determines whether it affects the balance-point calculation at all.
Variant A — resistor in the GALVANOMETER branch (does NOT affect the answer)Worked example
A 5Ω resistor sits in the unknown-battery branch (in series with the galvanometer). At balance, I=0 in this
whole branch.
Since I=0, there is ZERO voltage drop across EVERY component in that branch —
including the 5Ω resistor. The ratio is completely unaffected: 2V:1m = 1.5V:XP ⟹ XP=0.75m
Rule: any resistor purely in the galvanometer/unknown-battery
branch never affects the balance point, since I=0 there means V=IR=0 for every series component in it.
Variant B — resistor in SERIES with the driver battery (DOES affect the answer)Worked example
Now a 1.0Ω resistor sits in series with the 2V driver battery itself, before the wire (wire resistance 5Ω).
This resistor carries the full driver current, so it DOES matter: V_T=I_T
R_T: 2=I_T(1+5) ⟹ I_T=1/3 AVoltage across just the WIRE (excluding the added 1Ω): V_wire=I×R_wire=(1/3)(5)=5/3 VUse this REDUCED voltage (not the full 2V) for the ratio: (5/3)V:1m = 1.5V:XP ⟹
XP=0.9m
★ Key distinction: a resistor in the driver loop (carrying the
driving current) reduces the effective voltage available across the wire — recompute V_wire first via V=IR
before setting up the length ratio. A resistor in the galvanometer branch (Variant A) carries no current at
balance and can be ignored entirely.
Variant C — resistor changes the LOCAL loop's own currentWorked
example
Same setup as Variant B (1Ω in the driver loop, wire=5Ω, driver=2V), unknown battery 1.5V/0.8Ω.
V_T=I_T R_T: 1.5=I_T(0.8+1) ⟹ I_T=5/6 A [local loop reasoning for the unknown
battery's own branch]Cross-check via V_t=E−Ir: V_t=1.5−(5/6)(0.8)=5/6V ✓Ratio: 2V:1m = (5/6)V:XP ⟹ XP=0.417m
s21qp21q5 — full potentiometer structured QStructured Q
Battery EMF 4.0V, r=0.35Ω, wire XY (0.90Ω) + fixed resistor R. PD across XY = 1.8V.
(i) Current in XY: V=IR: 1.8=I(0.90) ⟹ I=2.0A(ii) Electrons in 45s: Q=It=2(45)=90C; Q=Ne ⟹ N=5.6×10²⁰(iii) R: V_T=I×R_T: 4=2(0.35+0.90+R) ⟹ R=0.75Ω(c)(i) Cell EMF 1.2V, balance at XP=0.30m. Total length L: 1.8V:L = 1.2V:0.30m ⟹
L=0.45m
(ii) R replaced with a GREATER resistance. Effect on P's position? "As R increases, the voltage XY
decreases and therefore the pointer will have to be moved to the right to once again give a voltage of 1.2V."
(d) Wire replaced by a SECOND wire, same length & material, SMALLER cross-sectional area. Is
the new XP shorter, longer, or the same? "As the area decreases, the resistance of the wire will increase and so
the potential difference across it will also increase. Length XP will have to be made shorter to get the same
0.84V."
✓ Quick Recap — Full Chapter Cheat-Sheet
★ Ratio vs Rate: V, R, ρ are RATIOS (read a point, never a gradient). Current is a RATE (gradient of Q-t, or
area under I-t if not constant).
Q=It=Ne. V=W/Q for both PD and EMF. V=IR (Ohm's law, temperature/R constant).
R=ρl/A. ★ The three separate proportionality constants (R∝l, R∝T, R∝1/A) are NEVER interchangeable and each
needs the OTHER TWO factors held constant.
Series: I same, V adds, R adds. Parallel: V same, I adds, 1/R adds.
V_t=E−Ir. At I=0 (open circuit or potentiometer balance), V_t=E exactly. Power to external R is max when
r=R.
KCL: ΣI_in=ΣI_out. KVL: ΣEMF=ΣPD in a loop — use ONE reference battery, mark polarities, loop consistently,
+→− is positive.
★ Potentiometer: V∝l along the wire. A resistor in the GALVANOMETER branch never matters (I=0 there at
balance). A resistor in the DRIVER loop DOES matter — recompute the effective V across the wire first.